United States Unseals Civil Action Filed Against Approximately $2M in Digital Currency Involved in Hamas Fundraising

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

The Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia today announced the unsealing of a civil forfeiture action against approximately $2 million dollars in digital currency held by Tether Limited (Tether) and Binance Holdings LTD (Binance) accounts connected with Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company (BuyCash), a Gaza-based money transfer business that was involved in financially supporting Hamas – a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) – as well as its agents and collaborators.

“Terrorist organizations like Hamas and their affiliates rely on shadowy financial networks to fund their deadly operations,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “By seizing millions in cryptocurrency, the Justice Department is aggressively dismantling the financial infrastructure of terrorism and refusing to allow our digital currency platforms to become safe havens for terrorist financing.”

“The forfeiture action executed today is an example of how diligently our office works to prevent any actions from taking place that support foreign terrorist organizations,” said U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro for the District of Colombia. “Our partnership with other law enforcement agencies strengthens us to uphold the safety of the American people from entities that threaten the security of our citizens.”

“The forfeiture action unsealed today demonstrates that no matter what lengths terrorism financers take to obscure their illegal transactions, the FBI will aggressively disrupt the transmission of illicit proceeds intended to support designated terrorist organizations like Hamas,” said Assistant Director in Charge Steven J. Jensen of the FBI Washington Field Office.

BuyCash, and one of its owners, Ahmed M. M. Alaqad, have been suspected of supporting various terrorist organizations including Hamas, ISIS, Al-Qaida affiliates and others. After the October 2023 attacks on Israel, BuyCash and Alaqad were designated as having materially supported Hamas under Executive Order 13224 by the U.S. Department of Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC). Since 2017, BuyCash and Alaqad have supported several foreign terrorist organizations. In 2017, BuyCash was used for the procurement of large quantities of online infrastructure on behalf of ISIS. In September 2019, BuyCash was used to receive funds from a known Al-Qaida affiliate. In 2019, law enforcement identified various instances where BuyCash, with the direct support of Alaqad, directly aided in the transfer of fiat currency to known individuals and entities in support of Hamas. In June 2021, Israel’s National Bureau for Counter Terrorist Financing seized various digital currency accounts connected to Hamas and the Izz-al-Din Qassam Brigades, including one involving BuyCash.

The complaint describes a detailed scheme whereby users utilized BuyCash to fund accounts held by Tether and Binance to obfuscate their financial support of international terrorist organizations, including Hamas. Before and after the October 2023 attacks, one account was reported to have received at least $4 million to support Hamas.

The government’s forfeiture action targets multiple accounts previously seized from Tether and Binance connected to BuyCash and removed approximately $2 million dollars from streams of funds supporting international terrorism.

A civil forfeiture complaint contains mere allegations. The burden to prove forfeitability in a civil forfeiture proceeding is upon the government.

The FBI Washington D.C. Field Office is investigating the case.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Rajbir S. Datta and Thomas Saunders for the District of Columbia are prosecuting the case with assistance from Trial Attorney Allison Ickovic of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) and Deputy Chief Alicia Cook of the National Security Division. Critical assistance was provided by Paralegal Specialists Brian Rickers, Gina Torres, and the Department of Justice’s Office of International Affairs.  

Washington Hunting Guide and Outfitting Company Enter Guilty Pleas to Lacey Act Crime

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Branden Trager of Brush Prairie, Washington, and his guiding company Mayhem Services LLC pleaded guilty yesterday in federal court in Tacoma to violating the Lacey Act.

In pleading guilty, Trager admitted he and Mayhem Services violated the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) during a January 2023 hunting trip in western Washington and then transported the taken birds in violation of the Lacey Act. Enacted 125 years ago, the Lacey Act protects the nations wildlife resources by prohibiting wildlife violations that cross state or international borders. Trager also acknowledged that in 2022 he brought hunters into British Columbia, Canada, where he guided waterfowl hunting trips targeting the harlequin duck. He could not operate as a hunting guide under Canadian law.

The harlequin duck (Histrionicus histrionicus) is a small sea duck with a habitat ranging from Alaska to California. Hunters prize the harlequin as a trophy and as part of a challenge to hunt 41 North American waterfowl species. Washington closed harlequin hunting for the 2022-2023 season, but limited hunting remained open in British Columbia.

According to plea agreements filed in court, the recommended fines are $100,000 for Trager and $75,000 for Mayhem Services. The parties also agreed to recommend that the court order the defendants to make a public statement expressing contrition and emphasizing the importance of hunting, guiding, and wildlife regulations. Sentencing is scheduled for Oct. 16.

According to a Joint Factual Statement filed in court, the MBTA prohibits, among other things, taking migratory birds using a motor vehicle; taking migratory birds by using a vehicle to concentrate, drive, or rally them; taking migratory birds in excess of daily bag limits; taking or crippling a migratory bird and not make reasonable efforts to retrieve it; and transporting taken migratory birds belonging to another individual without tagging them. Taking includes pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or collecting.

The Lacey Act is the nation’s oldest wildlife trafficking law. It prohibits, among other things, transporting wildlife that had been illegally taken under federal, state, tribal or foreign law. The MBTA is a U.S. law that implemented treaties with Canada and other nations to ensure sustainable populations of migratory birds.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division made the announcement.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement led the investigation along with Homeland Security Investigations, British Columbia Conservation Officer Service, and the Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife.

Senior Trial Attorney Ryan Connors and Trial Attorney Sarah Brown of the Justice Department’s Environmental Crimes Section prosecuted the case with assistance from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Washington.

Federal Court Upholds Bureau of Reclamation’s Conversion of Water Service Contracts in Central Valley of California

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Last week, a judgment entered by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California confirmed the ability of the Bureau of Reclamation to convert water service contracts to long term repayment contracts pursuant to the Water Infrastructure and Improvements for the Nation Act. The converted contracts eliminate the need for future renewals and associated costs and allow contractors to lower their overall costs by prepaying their share of project construction costs. The converted contracts also benefit the government by facilitating faster repayment of construction costs which can provide funding for future water storage projects.

The Court agreed with Reclamation’s interpretation of the WIIN Act, that

  • the WIIN Act requires contract conversion upon request, and
  • WIIN Act § 4011(a)(4)(c) strips Reclamation of discretion to modify any “water service … contractual rights” other than those related to the financial terms specifically addressed by the WIIN Act.

Because those provisions removed Reclamation’s discretion, Reclamation was not required to conduct an analysis under the National Environmental Policy Act, or consult under the Endangered Species Act, as part of the contract conversions.

Acting Assistant Attorney General Adam Gustafson of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) made the announcement.

Trial Attorneys David Gehlert and Jeff Candrian of ENRD’s Natural Resources Section handled the case. 

Illinois Tax Preparer Sentenced for Role in $3.6M Covid-19 Fraud Scheme

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

An Illinois man was sentenced yesterday to 42 months in prison for his role in a scheme to fraudulently obtain over $3.6 million in small business loans under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and COVID19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program implemented by the Small Business Administration (SBA). 

According to court documents, Farooq Khan, 31, of Chicago, owned and operated Hannan Tax Services (Hannan Tax), a tax preparation company located in Chicago. From approximately May 2020 through October 2021, through Hannan Tax, Khan prepared and facilitated the submission of at least 30 fraudulent applications for loans through the PPP and EIDL program. At the time Kahn prepared and submitted the applications, he knew that the companies for which he sought the loans were non-operational and did not qualify. He also knowingly falsified the information contained in the applications, including the number of employees and tax records attributed to the defunct companies. Khan caused approximately $3.6 million to be fraudulently distributed by the SBA and PPP lenders. He also attempted to obtain at least an additional $588,900 in loans through other EIDL applications that were never funded for nonexistent companies. He personally obtained approximately $1.2 million of the fraudulent loan proceeds.     

Khan pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud on Feb. 19. At sentencing, he was also ordered to pay $3,645,104 in restitution. 

Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Special Agent in Charge Douglas S. DePodesta of the FBI Chicago Field Office, and Special Agent-in-Charge Matthew J. Scarpino of Immigration and Customs Enforcement Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI) Chicago made the announcement.   

The FBI Chicago Field Office and ICE-HSI are investigating the case. 

Trial Attorney Claire Sobczak Pacelli of the Criminal Division’s Fraud Section is prosecuting the case. 

Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Justice Department’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 8667205721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form

Defense News in Brief: Living Namesake Rides First Set of Sea Trials for DDG 124

Source: United States Navy

In a rare moment of living history, ship namesake and Medal of Honor recipient, Col. Harvey “Barney” Barnum Jr. joined members of future USS Harvey C. Barnum Jr.’s (DDG 124) crew, the Navy programmatic team, and industry partners onboard the ship’s first set of sea trials, departing from General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, July 15.

Two Mexican Nationals Sentenced for Roles in Black Market Peso Exchange Money Laundering Scheme

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

Two Mexican nationals were sentenced today by U.S. District Judge Keith P. Ellison to 55 months each in prison for their roles in a two-year, multimillion-dollar trade-based money laundering conspiracy to move drug trafficking proceeds through Texas to Mexico.

According to court documents, Mauricio Anzures-Zarate, 53, of Mexico City, Mexico, and Beatriz Salcedo-Carreon, 63, of Guadalajara, Mexico, participated in a sophisticated, international money laundering conspiracy to transfer funds from the sale of illegal drugs in the United States to cartels in Mexico without physically transporting money across the U.S.-Mexico border. The conspirators concealed those funds through the movement of goods between the two countries.

“The defendants used an elaborate, trade-based money laundering scheme to exploit our financial system and transfer the proceeds of illegal drug trafficking from the United States to Mexico,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Matthew R. Galeotti of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “These financial facilitators actively promoted cartel operations in cities across the United States, which enabled the flow of deadly narcotics into our communities. The Criminal Division will continue to pursue the total elimination of cartels and the money launderers who enable their pernicious activities.”

“The lifeblood of any drug trafficking organization is the uninterrupted flow of cash,” said U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei for the Southern District of Texas. “Here, defendants laundered drug proceeds through a sophisticated trade-based scheme. This criminal operation, and others like it, put money in the pockets of the cartels and endangered lives on both sides of the border. Taking this conspiracy out of commission is a great win, but it’s just the beginning.”

“Despite the sophisticated tactics used to conceal profits made from smuggling poison into our country by the Mexican cartels, our expertise enabled us to dismantle their thriving operations,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge William Kimbell of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Houston Division. “DEA, along with its federal counterparts, has dealt a significant blow to the finances of the Mexican cartels through the incredible investigative work of our agents. If we trace your money activities back to the cartels, you will have your day in court and will face justice.”

“Anzures-Zarate and Salcedo-Carreon thought they could escape justice, but found our reach extends past the money trail they left,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Lucy Tan of IRS Criminal Investigation’s (IRS-CI) Houston Field Office. “They conspired to use black market peso exchanges, which are one of the classic methods to launder drug dollars, and a method that leaves a traceable trail to the cartels. For businesses that get approached for a quick cash sale to transport goods into Central and South America, remember that we will find you because your greed leaves evidence.”

According to court documents, the defendants directed money couriers to collect drug proceeds in numerous U.S. cities and then transfer the funds to Laredo, Texas, to be laundered through local businesses. As part of the scheme, store owners in downtown Laredo accepted the drug proceeds as payment for merchandise to be exported to businesses in Mexico. In furtherance of the conspiracy, Salcedo-Carreon, Anzures-Zarate, and others instructed the Mexican businesses to transfer pesos to accounts or people in Mexico who were affiliated with cartels. Through this trade-based money laundering scheme, Mexican cartels disguised illicit drug proceeds as legitimate international commercial transactions and received laundered drug proceeds in Mexico without physically transporting cash across the U.S.-Mexico border. Eight other defendants were previously convicted and sentenced for their roles in the money laundering conspiracy. Anzures-Zarate was ordered to pay a money judgement of $1,176,165 and Salcedo-Carreon was ordered to pay a money judgement of $887,269.

The DEA and IRS-CI investigated the case. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs and the Criminal Division’s Narcotic and Dangerous Drug Section’s Office of Judicial Attaché in Bogotá, Colombia provided significant assistance in this matter. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs worked with law enforcement partners in Mexico to secure the arrest and April 2024 extradition of Salcedo-Carreon.

Trial Attorneys Keith H. Liddle and Stephanie Williamson of the Criminal Division’s Money Laundering and Asset Recovery Section (MLARS) and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lance Watt, Amanda Gould, and former Assistant U.S. Attorney José Angel Moreno for the Southern District of Texas prosecuted the case. 

Justice Department Launches Second Investigation into George Mason University

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division announced today that it has launched an investigation into George Mason University to determine whether the University has denied equal treatment of individuals based on race or national origin, in violation of Title VI.

The compliance review investigation will examine whether George Mason University, a recipient of federal financial assistance, has engaged in discriminatory practices based on race, color, or national origin against its students. It will be conducted pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits a recipient of federal funds from discrimination based on such protected characteristics. Institutions of higher education that are governed by Title VI are to protect students’ unfettered access to the school’s educational environment and opportunities, free from discrimination. The investigation will focus on discrimination against students based on race or national origin in George Mason’s admissions practices and the awarding of student benefits and scholarships. It will also investigate the University’s response to antisemitism on campus.

“Public educational institutions are contractually obligated to follow our nation’s federal civil rights laws when receiving federal funds,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “No one should be denied access to opportunity or resources because of their race, color, or national origin, and the United States is committed to keeping our universities free of such invidious bias.”

Note: Review the notice letter here.

Remarks of Deputy Director/General Counsel Ramona D. Elliott for the 60th Annual Seminar of the National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees

Source: United States Department of Justice

Note: Remarks as prepared for delivery.

Thank you for the opportunity to speak with you today. I last joined you in San Francisco three years ago, and I thank President Lon Jenkins, Vice President Melissa Davey, and the rest of the National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees’ leadership team for their indulgence in arranging for me to participate today by video. While we wish that we could meet with you in person, I value this opportunity on behalf of the United States Trustee Program to share with you information that is important to all of us.

I am happy to pick up where we left off last year. I am supported by a strong and experienced leadership team you know well. And we are all committed to moving the Program forward in accomplishing our critical role in the bankruptcy system. 

There have been, and will be more, changes further to the government’s broader efficiency objectives. You see that today in my appearance by video. Among other measures, we are minimizing travel costs that are unrelated to court appearances.

And as you may have seen reported, the USTP will have less staff. This is reflected in the President’s recent Budget Request for Fiscal Year 2026. If enacted, the President’s Budget will reduce the USTP’s staffing to 670 employees. Many Program staff have already taken advantage of the offers to retire or resign by the end of September.

Fortunately, as a nationwide Program, we have opportunities to build on our earlier consolidation efforts to more effectively deploy our resources. We can leverage staff by looking beyond the boundaries of individual field offices and even regions, and we will consolidate more functions across the Program. These efforts will lessen burdens for individual field offices and improve consistency across the country.

In the weeks and months to come, the Program will refocus and enhance its efficiency in exercising our core statutory duties. I assure you that trustee supervision remains an important priority. We will continue to discuss with your leadership ways we can work together to improve the efficient administration of chapter 13 cases.

But I want to touch on two things that have come up already in those conversations. The first is criminal referrals. You play an important role in promoting the integrity of the bankruptcy process by referring suspected criminal activity. Please continue to make your criminal referrals to your local field office. And if there have been staffing changes in that office, feel free to elevate to the Assistant U.S. Trustee or the U.S. Trustee. 

The second issue that has been raised relates to trustee budget season. Many of you have submitted your annual budgets for the next fiscal year. Program staff remain committed to completing our review of your budgets, resolving any issues, and issuing your compensation notices as expeditiously as possible before the end of September. In fact, some of you have heard from us already.

We also understand that many of you remain rightly concerned about the financial impact of the prolonged decrease in case filings that began at the outset of the pandemic. My message on the operating reserve cap remains the same as the last time I spoke with you: (1) the operating reserve cap remains suspended; and (2) you will receive plenty of notice before any hard cap is reinstituted.

We continue to have discussions with each of you regarding an appropriate year-end target for your operating reserves. As we have said before, we generally expect the operating reserves not to exceed 50 percent, unless there is an adequate justification in writing. We are also addressing on a case-by-case basis trust operations that are significantly over- or under-reserved. 

Lastly, I want to remind you that the operating reserve is designed to provide funds to cover actual and necessary trust operation expenses, particularly in the first part of each new fiscal year. As case filings rebound, the continued suspension of the operating reserve cap requires your commitment to remain accountable for managing your operating expenses, including your reserve. Controlling trust operation costs benefits the system broadly, including putting downward pressure on your fixed percentage fees.   

I will turn to trustee recruitment, which is another of the USTP’s foundational statutory responsibilities. We are committed to recruiting and appointing highly qualified private trustees. I am pleased to report that the quality of interested trustee candidates remains strong.

For the first three quarters of FY 2025 ending June 30, we have successfully recruited and appointed 41 new trustees, including three chapter 13 trustees. We also have closed four standing chapter 12 trust operations and replaced them with case-by-case trustees. In addition, we are actively recruiting a chapter 13 standing trustee in Richmond, Virginia.

We appreciate your colleagues’ efforts to keep U.S. Trustees apprised of their plans to resign or retire and working with the Program to facilitate a smooth transition. Providing advance notice is important for both you and us. With each departure, we evaluate whether to recruit a successor trustee or to consolidate the trusteeship with another operation. That decision is largely dictated by case filings and trust operation finances. We are committed to all of you to ensure financially viable trust operations.

Successfully running a trust operation requires effectively safeguarding sensitive information to protect the trust operation and those who have provided sensitive information in the bankruptcy process. Sadly, the nature of your work in handling and disbursing funds has attracted bad actors eager to exploit vulnerabilities in the process. Continued vigilance from each of you — as well as every member of your staff — remains as important as ever.

Fortunately, you have procedures to mitigate these risks, even as these schemes evolve over time. For example, trustee adoption of positive pay and secure electronic payments has reduced the potential for misdirected paper checks and related schemes from bad actors. Likewise, STACS (the Standing Trustee Alliance for Computer Security) helps improve the security of your computer systems. We value our participation in STACS as a critical information-sharing measure to protect trust operations and personal data.

Notwithstanding these important activities, some trustees have experienced breaches or other cybersecurity incidents. These events require immediate action to mitigate potential harm. Indeed, trustees must inform the USTP as soon as possible, in addition to giving appropriate notice to affected parties if required by law. While it may take some time to understand all relevant facts, you must not delay in initiating your remediation and notification efforts. And to be clear, trustees remain obligated to perform these critical functions even if another party, such as a software vendor, undertakes parallel remediation and notification efforts.

I remind you that the Chapter 13 Trustee Handbook and Supplemental Materials specifically address insurance coverage for cyber liability. While these materials specifically mention a $1 million policy limit per occurrence, I want to make clear that this is not a hard cap. In working with NACTT’s liaison committee in recent years, we have consistently stressed that trustees can, and should, periodically evaluate their cyber liability risks and make an appropriate justification to their U.S. Trustee if they believe that the $1 million policy limit is insufficient. The Program takes these requests seriously.

Next, I want to touch on something else that I addressed the last time I spoke with you. Then, I informed you that we would soon begin a pilot in a single region of the Program’s new, permanent policy to conduct first meetings of creditors by video in chapter 7, 12, and 13 cases. Last year we updated you on our progress, and today I can close the circle and report that the Program successfully completed its nationwide transition to Zoom 341 meetings.

I thank you and your leadership in ensuring that the meetings have proceeded smoothly with few reported issues.  We especially appreciated the efforts of Lon Jenkins and Krispen Carroll in arranging a special trustee-only Q&A session with the USTP at the outset of the nationwide expansion. More than 100 of you attended this session as we proactively addressed many of your concerns unique to chapter 13 practice.

The Program spent more than three years researching, developing, and implementing the transition to video 341 meetings. We were very deliberate, and I thought it would be helpful to provide some insight into the procedures that underpin the successful nationwide rollout.

As you know, we procured and provided to each of you a Zoom license for conducting these virtual meetings. We also established standard Zoom settings and features. That includes a Zoom login page with an FBI warning and a formal virtual background for your use when conducting your video 341 meetings.

We also developed Interim Procedures for conducting these virtual meetings. And we devoted substantial time and effort in assisting and providing training for you. We made this significant investment and developed these minimum standards to ensure adequate security, to maintain decorum, and to promote consistency and uniformity nationally. But we also were careful to retain flexibility in our implementation to permit improvements or adjustments as we gained experience and obtained your feedback. 

For example, the settings and virtual background were subject to adjustment upon U.S. Trustee approval. The Interim Procedures contemplated the incorporation or use of other features, technology, hardware, software, or security protections as virtual meeting technology developed and we learned more. And although the USTP-provided Zoom licenses were limited to conducting 341 meetings, we also have been clear that you may purchase other Zoom licenses or video conferencing capability for other trust operation business.   

Now that we have fully transitioned to Zoom meetings, through our liaison groups we are engaged with NACTT, as well as with the chapter 7 and chapter 12 trustee organizations (NABT and ACT12), about suggestions for further improvements. This includes incorporating NACTT’s feedback and authorizing you to deploy enhanced virtual waiting room videos, subject to key safeguards and USTP approval. These videos assist debtors by providing additional information to facilitate their successful progress through their chapter 13 cases.

Another is the ongoing pilot of a virtual “portal” led by Al Russo and Lon Jenkins, which is designed to reduce staffing burdens on your trust operations by increasing debtor access to the meetings through their mobile devices. In our liaison group meeting yesterday, we discussed extending that testing more broadly. If you have other suggestions for improvements, we encourage you to reach out to your leadership and share them.  

In this same vein, I note that the Program is also engaged with NACTT and the other trustee organizations about proposed changes to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2003. The trustee organizations sent suggestions to the Judicial Conference’s Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy Rules advocating for changes to both the timing and location of the meetings. Nancy Whaley serves as NACTT’s representative on the Rules Committee, and I appreciate her assistance in engaging with all three trustee organizations to try to address your concerns. This includes exploring potential clarifications to the USTP’s interim procedures.

With respect to the timing of the 341 meetings, we appreciated hearing NACTT’s perspective in seeking additional time to conduct the first meeting of creditors in chapter 13 cases. As to the location of the meetings, I understand that there is a concern about inconsistencies in the USTP’s current practice. So, I want to explain that practice and hopefully dispel any misunderstanding.

The USTP’s procedures specify that trustees should conduct virtual meetings from their primary business location or another location within the district. They also allow for flexibility for conducting meetings from alternative locations when circumstances warrant. And they include an approval process for exceptions.

Absent unusual circumstances, U.S. Trustees can, and should, approve infrequent exception requests so long as the trustee takes reasonable steps to satisfy decorum and information security requirements. We have recently reiterated this policy with the U.S. Trustees to promote consistency in the exception process.

Again, I appreciate NACTT’s willingness to engage with us to hopefully resolve these concerns.

The last topic I want to touch on is chapter 13 trustee audits. Collectively, chapter 13 trustees distribute billions to creditors each year, and the audits are a critical tool that ensures public confidence in the bankruptcy system. As you know, we have a new five-year contract cycle, and I thank you for your efforts in successfully completing the audits for the first year. 

You were each audited by a different firm than the one that performed your audits for the prior three years. Along the way, you raised legitimate questions and concerns. In addition, after the audits were completed, we solicited and obtained your feedback.  We have made adjustments in response to your input to improve the process. And we conducted our own review and evaluation, which resulted in additional changes.

Next year is the first year of the “streamlined” audits.  The audits will be reduced in scope with fewer tested elements and with less in-person field work. We expect that this will reduce the costs for all trust operations. And as we did with the first year of the new contract, we will review and evaluate this second year and welcome your feedback.

To wrap up, I appreciate the invitation to join you today. As the Program explores new ways to efficiently and effectively meet our mission, we are excited to continue our collaborative relationship with the NACTT.

And I look forward to working with your incoming President Greg Burrell and your strong leadership team on improving the efficient administration of chapter 13 cases. You have an ambitious agenda for your conference, and I thank you for sharing some of your time with me this morning.

Engineer Pleads Guilty to Stealing for Chinese Government’s Benefit Trade Secret Technology Designed for Missile Launch and Detection

Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

A Santa Clara County man and former engineer at a Southern California company pleaded guilty today to stealing trade secret technologies developed for use by the U.S. government to detect nuclear missile launches, track ballistic and hypersonic missiles, and to allow U.S. fighter planes to detect and evade heat-seeking missiles.

Chenguang Gong, 59, of San Jose, pleaded guilty to one count of theft of trade secrets. He remains free on $1.75 million bond.

According to his plea agreement, Gong – a dual citizen of the United States and China – transferred more than 3,600 files from a Los Angeles-area research and development company where he worked – identified in court documents as the victim company – to personal storage devices during his brief tenure with the company last year.

The files Gong transferred include blueprints for sophisticated infrared sensors designed for use in space-based systems to detect nuclear missile launches and track ballistic and hypersonic missiles, as well as blueprints for sensors designed to enable U.S. military aircraft to detect incoming heat-seeking missiles and take countermeasures, including by jamming the missiles’ infrared tracking ability. Some of these files were later found on storage devices seized from Gong’s temporary residence in Thousand Oaks.

In January 2023, the victim company hired Gong as an application-specific integrated circuit design manager responsible for the design, development and verification of its infrared sensors. Beginning on approximately March 30, 2023, and continuing until his termination on April 26, 2023, Gong transferred thousands of files from his work laptop to three personal storage devices, including more than 1,800 files after he had accepted a job at one of the victim company’s main competitors.

Many of the files Gong transferred contained proprietary and trade secret information related to the development and design of a readout integrated circuit that allows space-based systems to detect missile launches and track ballistic and hypersonic missiles and a readout integrated circuit that allows aircraft to track incoming threats in low visibility environments.

Gong also transferred files containing trade secrets relating to the development of “next generation” sensors capable of detecting low observable targets while demonstrating increased survivability in space, as well as the blueprints for the mechanical assemblies used to house and cryogenically cool the victim company’s sensors. This information was among the victim company’s most important trade secrets that are worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Many of the files had been marked “[VICTIM COMPANY] PROPRIETARY,” “FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY,” “PROPRIETARY INFORMATION,” and “EXPORT CONTROLLED.”

Law enforcement also discovered that, between approximately 2014 and 2022, while employed at several major technology companies in the United States, Gong submitted numerous applications to ‘Talent Programs’ administered by the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The PRC government has established these talent programs as a means to identify individuals who have expert skills, abilities, and knowledge of advanced sciences and technologies in order to access and utilize those skills and knowledge in transforming the PRC’s economy, including its military capabilities.

In 2014, while employed at a U.S. information technology company headquartered in Dallas, Gong sent a business proposal to a contact at a high-tech research institute in China focused on both military and civilian products. In his proposal, translated from Chinese, Gong described a plan to produce high-performance analog-to-digital converters like those produced by his employer. In another Talent Program application from September 2020, Gong proposed to develop “low light/night vision” image sensors for use in military night vision goggles and civilian applications. Gong’s proposal included a video presentation that contained the model number of a sensor developed by an international defense, aerospace, and security company where Gong worked from 2015 to 2019.

Gong travelled to China several times to seek Talent Program funding in order to develop sophisticated analog-to-digital converters. In his Talent Program applications, Gong underscored that the high-performance analog-to-digital converters he proposed to develop in China had military applications, explaining that they “directly determine the accuracy and range of radar systems” and that “[m]issile navigation systems also often use radar front-end systems.” In a 2019 email, translated from Chinese, Gong remarked that he “took a risk” by traveling to China to participate in the Talent Programs “because [he] worked for…an American military industry company” and thought he could “do something” to contribute to China’s “high-end military integrated circuits.”

According to his plea agreement, the intended economic loss from Gong’s criminal conduct exceeds $3.5 million.

U.S. District Judge John F. Walter scheduled sentencing for Sept. 29, at which time Gong faces a statutory maximum penalty of 10 years in prison.

The FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office through the Counterintelligence Task Force in partnership with the State Department’s Diplomatic Security Service and Homeland Security Investigations is investigating this matter. The FBI’s San Francisco Field Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California also provided substantial assistance.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys David C. Lachman and Nisha Chandran for the Central District of California and Trial Attorney Brendan Geary of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.